The Buy Box Is a Hypothesis, Not a Wish List

← All insights

What a buyer can afford is a far bigger universe of businesses than what they can actually run. The entries that narrow a search are the exclusions, and the box is supposed to move as the buyer learns.

Most buyers build their buy box out of what they want. The better ones spend at least as much time on what they will walk away from, and the box does not really start working until they do.

A buy box, or a buy-side mandate if you want the formal term, is the description of what a buyer is actually looking for. Industries, geography, size, the buyer’s role, growth plans, and how the whole thing gets funded. Every buyer I take on builds one, and I ask a lot of questions to build it, but the finished document matters less than two things people tend to miss about it. The first is that the entries that narrow a search are mostly the exclusions, not the wants. The second is that the box is a first draft, not a contract, and a good search sharpens it rather than merely executing it.

Start with the part that feels like the whole thing and is really just the outer wall. A buyer can afford some maximum, set by their personal financial statement and by where the acquisition capital is coming from, and I need both of those early because they set the value range I search in. But what you can afford is a far bigger universe of businesses than what you can actually run, and the affordability ceiling does almost none of the real narrowing. Plenty of buyers arrive thinking the number is the box. It is the least interesting line in it.

The line that does the most work is the buyer’s role, and I push hard on it because the answer reshapes everything above it. Are you going to run this business full time, hands on the wheel every day? Or do you plan to work through a transition and then bring in people to run it with you or for you, stepping back into an ownership role rather than an operating one? Those are two different searches. They point at different industries, different sizes, sometimes different parts of the country, and a buyer who has not settled that question is going to look at every deal through two incompatible lenses and be unable to say why any of them fits. The role decision is upstream of most of the rest of the box, and when a buyer is vague about it, that vagueness contaminates everything downstream.

Then the exclusions, which is where a box goes from a wish list to a filter. I want the industries a buyer is drawn to, but I want just as badly the industries they want no part of, because a search defined only by what someone likes never actually rules anything out. Same with geography. Not just where they would prefer to be, but the places they will not live, and if they intend to manage a business semi-remotely, the places they are not willing to travel to on a regular basis. A buyer who tells me only what they want has handed me a box with no walls. A buyer who can tell me what they will decline has handed me something I can actually search against, because now when a business crosses my desk I can rule it out for a real reason instead of guessing whether it is close enough.

I also want to know what in a buyer’s own background makes them a credible owner for the industry they are targeting, and this one does double duty. It sharpens the box, because a buyer’s experience usually points toward the kinds of companies where they will not be starting from zero. And it is the same thing a seller is going to want to hear, because a seller handing over their business wants to believe the person taking it over has some business being in the chair. A buyer who cannot answer why they are a good fit for the industry has a problem that runs deeper than the box.

The last piece is where the search is pointed after the close. Some buyers are looking for a business to own and run and hold. Others are looking for a platform, a first acquisition they intend to grow, sometimes organically and sometimes by buying other businesses on top of it, and if that is the plan I need to know where the capital for those follow-on investments is going to come from, because a platform search is a different search than a search for an endpoint. It changes the size I am looking for, the industries where roll-ups actually work, and how I think about the management the business already has in place.

Here is the part that the checklist version of this advice always leaves out. The box you build on day one is a hypothesis, not a specification, and it is supposed to move. As a buyer and I work through real opportunities, actual businesses that are actually for sale, the buyer learns things about what they want that no intake conversation could have surfaced. They see a company in an industry they had excluded and realize the exclusion was based on an assumption that does not hold. They look at a deal at the top of their range and understand for the first time what that size of business really demands of an owner. The box gets revised, and the revision is not the buyer being indecisive. It is the buyer getting educated, and a good part of what I am doing while we vet opportunities is running that education on purpose.

The buyers who struggle are the ones at the two extremes. The buyer with no box wastes everyone’s time looking at everything and committing to nothing, which is the problem I wrote about in the first of these pieces. But the buyer who treats their initial box as fixed and final, who will not let contact with real deals teach them anything, is nearly as hard to help, because they have confused having a mandate with having judgment. The point of the box is not to lock the search down. It is to give the search a starting shape precise enough that every business I look at either fits or teaches us something about why it does not.

A note for the CPAs who refer clients to me

The affordability ceiling in a buyer’s box is built from two documents that are yours before they are mine: the personal financial statement and a real answer about where the acquisition capital is coming from. When a client of yours is thinking about buying, you are usually the first person who can say whether the number they have in their head is grounded or aspirational, and whether the funding plan, savings, a retirement account, a home equity line, a family loan, actually holds together once the tax consequences of each source are on the table. If you have a client starting to talk this way, that conversation is worth having with them early, and it is worth having me in it, because a buyer who walks into a search with a defensible ceiling and a clean funding story is a buyer I can actually place. The ones who struggle are almost always the ones whose numbers were never pressure-tested by someone who knew their full picture.

A note for the wealth advisors

The last question in a buyer’s box, whether they intend to grow the business after they buy it and how they will fund that growth, is where your role and mine overlap most directly. A client acquiring a platform they mean to build, by reinvestment and sometimes by further acquisition, is making a series of capital-allocation decisions over years, and those decisions run straight through the assets and the financing structure you help them manage. This is the strategic buyer more than the first-timer, the client who already owns something and is adding to it, and it is exactly the client whose growing enterprise value eventually becomes the larger investable base we talked about in the first of these notes. When a client of yours is thinking this way, being in the room early means you are shaping the growth-capital plan rather than reacting to it after the fact.